Main Field of Study and progress level:
Social Work: Second cycle, in-depth level of the course cannot be classified
Grading scale: Three-grade scale
Responsible department: Department of Social Work
Revised by: Head of Department of Social Work, 2020-06-10
Literature
Valid from:
2020 week 24
Evidensbaserat socialt arbete : teori, kritik, praktik Bergmark Anders, Bergmark Åke, Lundström Tommy Stockholm : Natur & kultur : 2011 : 191 s. : ISBN: 978-91-27-13125-5 (inb.) Mandatory Search the University Library catalogue
Utvärdering i socialt arbete : utgångspunkter, modeller och användning Blom Björn, Nygren Lennart, Morén Stefan 1. utg. : Stockholm : Natur & kultur : 2011 : 337 s. : ISBN: 978-91-27-11982-6 (inb.) Mandatory Search the University Library catalogue
Vedung Evert Utvärdering i politik och förvaltning 3., [omarb. och uppdaterade] uppl. : Lund : Studentlitteratur : 2009 : 315 s. : ISBN: 978-91-44-00174-6 Mandatory Search the University Library catalogue
Teori för socialt arbete Blom Björn, Morén Stefan 1. uppl. : Lund : Studentlitteratur : 2015 : 192 s. : ISBN: 9789144091655 Mandatory Search the University Library catalogue
Values in evaluation and social research House Ernest R., Howe Kenneth R. Thousand Oaks, Calif. : SAGE : 1999 : xxi, 152 s. : ISBN: 0-7619-1154-5 Mandatory Search the University Library catalogue
Going through the process: An examination of the operationalization of process use in empirical research on evaluation Amo C, Cousins J.B. New Directions for Evaluation, 2007(116), 5-26. : 2007 :
Hansen H. F. Choosing evaluation models: a discussion on evaluation design. Evaluation, 11(4), 447-462. : 2005 :
Applying single-case evaluation in social work. Kazi M. A., Wilson J. The British Journal of Social Work, 26(5), 699-717. : 1996 :
Leeuw F. L. Reconstructing program theories: Methods available and problems to be solved. American journal of evaluation, 24(1), 5-20. : 2003 :
Patton M. Q. Process use as a usefulism New Directions for Evaluation, 2007(116), 99-112. : 2007 :
Patton M. Q. Evaluation, knowledge management, best practices, and high quality lessons learned. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 329-336 : 2001 :
Patton M. Q. Feminist, yes, but is it evaluation? New directions for Evaluation, 2002(96), 97-108 : 2002 :
Beginning the conversation Sielbeck‐Bowen K. A., Brisolara S., Seigart D., Tischler C., Whitmore E. New directions for evaluation, 2002(96), 109-114 : 2002 :
Exploring feminist evaluation: The ground from which we rise Sielbeck-Bowen K. A., Brisolara S., Seigart D., Tischler C., Whitmore E. New directions for evaluation, 2002(96), 3-8 : 2002 :
Stame N. Theory-based evaluation and types of complexity Evaluation, 10(1), 58-76 : 2004 :
Regeringens insatser mot hedersrelaterat våld 2003-2007 : slutrapport från den nationella utvärderingen Hanberger Anders, Ghazinour Mehdi, Mårald Gunilla Umeå : UCER - Umeå Center for Evaluation Research, Umeå University : 2008 : 86 s. : ISBN: 978-91-7264-612-4 Mandatory Search the University Library catalogue
