The intersection of scientific knowledge and public discourse in the transition from natural to artificial methods of tree improvement
Research project
Biotechnology in forestry has long been shaped by debate. This project explores the historical roots of current discussions by examining past controversies over tree breeding and naturalness in Swedish forestry. By linking historical and philosophical perspectives with contemporary views and dialogue with forestry actors, the project investigates how trust and legitimacy around biotechnology are formed and how they shape the future of forestry.
This project examines the role of biotechnology in Swedish forestry through a historical and philosophical lens, focusing on how trust and legitimacy are formed. By analyzing historical debates on tree breeding, contemporary arguments about naturalness, and engaging in dialogue with forestry stakeholders, the project explores the interaction between science and public discourse. The aim is to generate new knowledge that strengthens science communication and contributes to a more nuanced and constructive debate on biotechnology in the future of forestry.
Over the past decades, biotechnology has been surrounded by both hopes and fears. These have stemmed from critical questions concerning ethics, safety, and what should be regarded as “natural.” However, while the debate within the scientific community has been comparatively positive toward the possibilities of biotechnology, the broader societal debate has been characterized by concern about the new technologies in the field. The views of different sectors on biotechnology influence the interaction between research and the public and ultimately underpin the legitimacy of science in society. It is therefore crucial to study forests and biotechnology with a focus on issues of trust and philosophical dimensions.
This project examines the role of biotechnology in Swedish forestry, with a focus on how societal trust and legitimacy are created. By analyzing historical debates on tree breeding, contemporary forestry actors’ arguments about naturalness, and by engaging in dialogue with forestry stakeholders about biotechnology, we contribute new knowledge aimed at strengthening science communication and societal dialogue.
The results of the project are directed toward researchers, the forestry industry, educators, and the media—key actors who play an important role in disseminating knowledge and shaping discussions about the environment and technology in society. By highlighting the encounter between science and public debate, we aim to contribute to a more nuanced and constructive discussion about the role of biotechnology in the forestry of the future.