Linguistics and the Eurovision Song Contest, 7.5 Credits

Contents

The course addresses linguistic perspectives on the Eurovision Song Contest. Using the Eurovision Song Contest as a starting point, the course provides an introduction to European language policy, discourse analysis, multilingualism and metaphors.

The course consists of five modules:

1. introduction to the Eurovision Song Contest from a linguistic perspective (1.5 credits)
2. discursive perspectives on gender, political identity, and nationality (1.5 credits)
3. multilingualism (1,5hp)
4. metaphors (1.5 credits)
5. individual specialisation (1,5hp)

Expected learning outcomes

In order to be awarded a 'Pass' grade, the student must be able to
Knowledge and Understanding:

• Understand and explain how the European linguistic context is reflected in the Eurovision Song Contest,
• Describe how multilingualism is reflected in the Eurovision Song Contest,

Abilities

• discuss language in relation to identity formation,
• identify and describe the use of metaphors in (song) texts,

Judgement and Approach

• independently analyse (song) texts from relevant linguistic perspectives,
• relate the specific premises of the Eurovision Song Contest to broader current language policy issues.

Required Knowledge

Form of instruction

The course is entirely net-based and is conducted via an online learning platform. Teaching takes place in the form of pre-recorded lectures, net-based group discussions and quiz exercises.
English is the medium of instruction in all modules.

Examination modes

Modules 1-4 are examined through assessment of written contributions in online discussion groups and quizzes, and each module is assessed with either grade Pass (G) or Fail (U).

Module 5 is examined through assessment of a written individual assignment with either grade Pass with distinction (VG), Pass (G), or Fail (U).
Examination format may be adapted for students granted special educational services due to a disability. Such adaptations must conform to the expected learning outcomes. The course coordinator shall make a decision concerning adapted examination format upon application by the student, after consulting the course examiner. The decision shall be forwarded to the student.
 
Students who have received a pass grade cannot resit for a higher grade.

Students who fail an exam on the first occasion will be able to sit the exam again at a later date. The first resit shall be scheduled no later than 2 months after the original exam, and no sooner than 10 workdays after the result of the original exam has been published. For exams during May or June, the first resit shall be scheduled no later than 3 months after the original exam. The date for the resit shall be published no later than on the day of the original exam. At least one additional resit shall be scheduled within a year after the original exam.

The examiner may decide that a student who does not reach a Pass grade on a written assignment can do a revision for a Pass grade, as an alternative to a full resit. Such a revision must be made within 10 days of the result being published.

A student who has failed to reach a Pass grade after two attempts has the right to having another examiner appointed for the following resit, unless overriding reasons apply. Requests for another examiner shall be directed to the Faculty Programme Director at the Dean's Office, Faculty of Arts.