Skip to content
printicon
Main menu hidden.
Syllabus:

Responsible Design of Interactive AI-Systems, 7.5 Credits

Swedish name: Design av interaktiva AI-system

This syllabus is valid: 2019-12-30 and until further notice

Course code: 5DV211

Credit points: 7.5

Education level: Second cycle

Main Field of Study and progress level: Computing Science: Second cycle, has second-cycle course/s as entry requirements

Grading scale: TH teknisk betygsskala

Responsible department: Department of Computing Science

Established by: Faculty Board of Science and Technology, 2021-01-13

Contents

This advanced level course is aimed to deepen knowledge and skills in design methodology for responsible development of interactive, intelligent systems and environments with focus on  human-centered artificial intelligens (AI), and in theories for Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) theory and new technology for interacting and collaborating with intelligent software agents and environments. The course builds upon research and theories developed in the intersection of AI and HCI, with special focus on socio-technical systems embedding AI, human-AI collaboration and related ethical and social aspects. Some of the core questions in focus during the course will be
  1. How are we going to collaborate with AI technology in the future?
  2. What happens with control and autonomy when the system learns and changes behaviour over time?
  3. How do we design an interactive, intelligent system in such a way that we embed into the system mechanisms for weighing together different stakeholders values in multicultural contexts (e.g. moral and ethics), as well as explaining its reasoning and guarantee transparency? and
  4. How do we embed a continuing responsible and participatory design process throughout the use of intelligent and collaborative systems?
The course is divided into the following two parts:
Module 1: Theory and methodology (4,5 ECT)
The theoretical part covers theoretical frameworks and methods for designing and evaluating interactive intelligent systems, and adopts a responsible AI perspective. The socio-technical systems perspective will be applied throughout the course with theories and methods supporting the development of socially intelligent systems. This includes human-centric factors vital when developing AI-based interactive systems, such as the effect of use, mechanisms for human development, motivation, behavior change, autonomy, empowerment, competence, relatedness, value for the individual and society, responsibility, accountability and ethics.

Methodology includes in particular responsible AI design, participatory action research approaches and activity-centered design. The theory and methodologies are applied in group exercises and in an interdisciplinary project in Module 2.
 
Module 2: Practical application of theory and methods in a project (3 ECT)
Theories and methods brought up in Module 1 are applied in a group project, which is conducted in parallel with the theoretical part. The project topic is motivated by a societal challenge and focuses on engaging potential end users and other stakeholders in an interdisciplinary participatory design process. Design activities can be done in labs with technology and material for prototype development and evaluation, and in environments outside of the university that stakeholders provide.

Expected learning outcomes

Knowledge and understanding
After having completed the course the student should be able to:
  • Understand, develop and evaluate interactive, intelligent systems who are proactive, reactive, emergent, social and (semi-)autonomous, in collaboration with humans. (ELO 1)
  • Explain how we in a responsible way can design interactive, intelligent systems for ensuring transparency, accountability, and, adherence to different stakeholders' and the society's (social and cultural) values (ELO 2)
  • Understand human-AI interaction as an element of dynamic activity systems based on theories about human activity (including norms and values), and how this translates into computational models useful for human-AI interaction and collaboration (ELO 3)
Skills and abilities
After having completed the course the student should be able to:
  • Critically analyze applications of theories, methods and tools for developing responsible AI and be able to identify results based on scientifically sound methods (ELO 4)
  • Develop and evaluate in collaboration with tentative end users, interactive intelligent systems and environments from the personal, social and ethical perspectives, which include aspects of safety, diversity, equal opportunities and responsible AI (ELO 5)
  • Apply relevant theories and models for analyzing, designing and constructing interactive intelligent systems in collaboration with users (ELO 6)
  • Collaborate in multi-disciplinary teams (ELO 7)
Values and attitudes
After having completed the course the student should be able to:
  • Demonstrate critical thinking, ethical judgment and understanding of the societal needs when developing interactive, intelligent systems (ELO 8)
  • Critically evaluate results from users involvment in the design process and compare these with theoretical, technological and societal expectations (ELO 9)

Required Knowledge

Univ: To be admitted you must have (or equivalent) 90 ECTS-credits including 60 ECTS-credits in Computing Science or two years of completed studies within a study programme (120 ECTS-credits). In both cases, includning at least one course (7.5 credits) on advanced level in Computing Science in the area of artficial intelligence, e.g. the course Artifical Intelligence - methods and applications (5DV181), Interactivity in smart environments (5DV185), or Cognitive Interaction Design (5DV188).

Proficiency in English equivalent to Swedish upper Secondary course English A/5. Where the language of instruction is Swedish, applicants must prove proficiency in Swedish to the level required for basic eligibility for higher studies.

Form of instruction

The course consists of lectures, project work in computer labs and other environments, and exercises in small groups. Parts of the teaching require mandatory attendance. In addition to scheduled activities the course also requires individual work with the material.

Examination modes

Examination of Module 1 (ELO 1-3 and 8-9) is done through a written examination in halls. The grade on this part is one of the grades Fail (U), Pass (3) or Pass with Merit (4), and Pass with Distinction (5). For all students who do not pass the regular examination there is another opportunity to do the examination.
 
The examination of Module 2 (ELO 4-7) is done through completing a project conducted in collabortations with an external part, either individually or in group according to instructions provided during the course. The project work is primarly assessing ELO 4-7. Parts of the project work may be done through field studies outside the university in collaboration with societal organisations, and meetings during the project can be located at such organisation. This module contains examining parts that require mandatory attendance such as field studies, examining project meetings and presentation / demonstration of the project. The grade on the practical part is one of the grades Fail (U) or Pass (G).
 
A student that has failed the practical part of the course but has regularly attended a majority of the project activities can be given a re-exam covering the parts that the student has missed. If a student has not participated in the project activities (or missed a majority of them), the student can enroll in the practical part next time the course is given. The student does not have the right to continue with the same project the next time (s)he attend the course, and may need to start over with the project work in collaboration with a new student group and with a new topic.

On the whole course one of the grades Fail (U), Pass (3) or Pass with Merit (4), and Pass with Distinction (5) is given. At least the grade Pass must be achieved on each part in order to get a grade for the whole course. The grade set for the course is a weighed assessment of all parts of the examination.
 
A student who has passed an examination may not be re-examined. A student who has taken two tests for a course or segment of a course, without passing, has the right to have another examiner appointed, unless there exist special reasons (Higher Education Ordinance Chapter 6, section 22). Requests for new examiners are made to the head of the Department of Computing Science.

Examination based on this syllabus is guaranteed for two years after the first registration on the course. This applies even if the course is closed down and this syllabus ceased to be valid.

Deviations from the examination forms mentioned in this syllabus can be made for a student who has a decision on pedagogical support due to disability. Individual adaptation of the examination forms should be considered based on the student's needs. The examination form is adapted within the framework of the expected learning outcomes of the course syllabus. At the request of the student, the course responsible teacher, in consultation with the examiner, must promptly decide on the adapted examination form. The decision must then be communicated to the student.

Transfer of credits
Students have the right to be tried on prior education or equivalent knowledge and skills acquired in the profession can be credited for the same education at Umeå University. Application for credit is submitted to the Student Services / Degree. For more information on credit transfer available at Umeå University's student web, www.student.umu.se, and the Higher Education Ordinance (Chapter 6). A refusal of crediting can be appealed (Higher Education chapter 12) to the University Appeals Board. This applies to the whole as part of the application for credit transfer is rejected.

Other regulations

In a degree, this course may not be included, in whole or in part, simultaneously with another course of similar content. If in doubt, consult the student counselors at the Department of Computer Science and / or program director of programs.

Literature

Valid from: 2021 week 1

Articles provided by the department or the web.