Strategic Project Management D, 30 Credits

Contents

The course highlights key issues in strategic project management. It integrates profound theoretical insights with practical applications in a learning environment characterized by active student participation, both individually and in groups.

The course is given and examined in English.

Generic learning outcome.
In addition to the specific learning outcomes for each module (see below), the course has a number of goals for the development of generic skills. After completing the course, the student should be able to:

• reflect on equality, diversity and multiculturalism multiculturality and work effectively in multicultural teams
• integrate expertise from different knowledge areas in order to identify, analyze and solve organizational problems
• plan, conduct, and present investigations, both orally and in writing, for an academic audience as well as an audience of business practitioners.

Common expected learning outcome:

• communicate central concepts for the course in English, both orally and in writing

The core course consists of three modules, which will be further described below:
Module 1.  Perspectives on Management and Strategy, 7.5 credits
Module 2.  Strategic Project Management Decision Making 7.5 credits
Module 3.  Master level Thesis 15 credits

Module 1. Perspectives on Management and Strategy, 7.5 credits
This module highlights key challenges facing contemporary firms in a globalized world. The students will gain an interdisciplinary understanding of the business context and the intertwined nature of its events and processes. Alternative theoretical perspectives on strategy will be presented to provide a comprehensive platform for the forthcoming core modules. Students will practice to think strategically from both an internal and external perspective. Module 1 integrates theoretical insights with practical applications in a learning environment characterized by active participation, both individually and in groups. Throughout the module the students are encouraged to develop their own strategic approaches. During the module, students will also be introduced to the code of academic conduct, e.g. referencing, or how to avoid plagiarism and cheating.

Expected learning outcomes

• After completing this module, the student should be able to:
• describe and analyze the foundations of strategy and strategic perspectives,
• propose solutions to cope with internal and external strategic challenges and complexities,
• propose appropriate strategies to meet key dilemmas concerning for example innovation, products, process, organization, marketing and business models,
• critically reflect upon the consequences of strategic choices and assess the need for further knowledge and skills,
• describe, recognize and apply academic conduct to the student's own work.

Focus of instruction
In addition to lectures and guest lectures, the learning is supported by cases and seminars. The module requires significant amount of independent study. This means reading the assigned compulsory book chapters and articles. It is the student's responsibility to come prepared for lectures and seminars, and to participate actively in discussions. Case studies are carried out in groups of 3-5 students with oral and written presentation. Students also learn  academic ethics as well as academic conduct including referencing and how to avoid plagiarism and cheating.

Module examination modes
The basis of examination in this module consists of written group assignments, a written individual hall exam, and an individual onlinetest of academic conduct. Attendance at seminars is mandatory and is thus a requirement to pass the module. A passing grade for each examined part of the module is required to pass. Note as well examination modes below for the course as a whole.

 Module 2. Strategic Project Management Decision Making, 7.5 credits
The module will explore different perspectives on strategy and decision-making in strategic project management. Important for creating strategic projects is entrepreneurial and innovative activity within existing organizations, so-called corporate entrepreneurship or intrapreneurship. Strategies for corporate entrepreneurship and innovation are discussed in relation to the conditions characterizing different types of firms and public sector units.

Expected learning outcomes
After completing this module, the student should be able to:

• describe and assess the complexity of strategic project management decision making
• describe and compare different forms of corporate entrepreneurship in different types of organizations
• analyse how factors both within the organization and in the organizational environment support or hinder entrepreneurship and innovation
• evaluate an organization's conditions for and work with corporate entrepreneurship, and give specific recommendations for the continued work
• present and communicate the evaluation and recommendations referred to above 
• analyse and discuss the importance and outcome of entrepreneurial leadership in an established organization
• analyze the relevance and credibility of sources used as basis for evaluation and practical recommendations

Focus of instruction
Emphasis is placed on student activity, and learning is supported by different seminars, case analyses, group work and lectures.  As an integrating assignment, students will conduct an evaluation of an organization, resulting in practical recommendations.
 
Examination modes
Examination comprises of several individual written assignments, seminar discussion and a written group case assignment including seminar presentation. A passing grade is required for each part. See also examination modes below.

Module 3. Master level Thesis, 15 credits
The objective of the Master's thesis is to develop the student's knowledge of scientific work and to provide students with the understanding of how to plan, conduct, and present their work independently. A further aim is to develop skills for the critical examination of investigations and research reports and to provide the student with the opportunity for a deeper level of theoretical study within a chosen area.

Section 1. Side-oppositions, 0 credits
The aim of this module is to develop the student's ability to examine investigations and reports from a critical and scientific point of view. This module of the thesis work requires the student to submit written critical analyses of one other Master's thesis and attend the seminar where the thesis is presented. This is an individual assignment.

Section 2. Master's thesis, 15 credits
Thesis work should prove the student's ability to apply a scientific approach in independently treatment of theories. In addition, the thesis should be characterized by relevance and topicality. The methodology discussions must be very clearly connected to the problem area and the different parts of the theses must be well integrated into a harmonized unity. The thesis should aim to deliver a theoretical contribution to the area.

Section 3. Main opposition, 0 credits
In this module, the aim is to document the student's critical abilities through the performance of an individual written as well as an oral major critical analysis of another Master's thesis. The oral part of the main opposition can be conducted together with the co-author of the thesis.

Expected learning outcomes
After completing this course, the student should be able to:

• demonstrate a good understanding of the chosen research question, the area of research, and related methodological issues
• Independently process theories with a scientific midset
• apply a scientific perspective in using theory and prior literature and discuss how the study contributes or is related to previous research in the research field
• convincingly argue for the choice of research method
• collect a relevant empirical material
• analyse and discuss the empirical material by relevant analyses methods.
• discuss societal and/or ethical issues of relevance for the thesis
• communicate the main arguments, contents and results of the study in a scholarly manner
• defend the thesis at a scientific seminar
• critically examine other reports both orally and in writing.

Focus of instruction
The author's independence and responsibility is emphasized in the conducting of thesis work. Thus the supervisor's influence and control is reduced in order to create the necessary conditions for individual autonomy, creativity, and personal responsibility. It is understood that the ongoing Master's thesis work is presented to the supervisor on at least three occasions during the thesis process. Normally, the student can be expected to take active part in in-progress seminars organized by the supervisor. Supervision is only guaranteed during the semester when the student is firstly registered on the thesis course.

Examination modes
Examinations takes place during set exam periods within the semester.

Section 1. Side-oppositions, 0hp
The module is examined through a written 'side-opposition', i.e. critical analyses, of one other one-year master thesis (or Swedish 'Magister' thesis, but not a Bachelor's thesis. Written side-oppositions are always individual assignments. Instructions are given in the thesis manual. In addition participation in the thesis seminar is required. Side-oppositions are graded as pass or fail.

Section 2. Master's thesis, 15hp
The module is examined through authoring and defending an independent work. The grades used are: pass with distinction, pass or fail. The thesis is evaluated and graded by a grading teacher and examiner, whereas the individual effort in the defense is graded at the seminar.

In case the Master's Thesis is not accepted as it is, it may be revised according to instructions given by the supervisor (or by the grader) or subject of a new effort. In cases of revision, the new version should be completed and delivered to the grading teacher within four weeks after the final seminar/or the date the revision was presented.

Section 3. Main opposition, 0 credits
The module is examined through an individual written as well as an oral main opposition (critical examination where the student is responsible for leading the seminar) on another one-year Master's thesis (or a 'Magister' thesis). The oral main opposition can be conducted in collaboration with your co-author on your thesis. The main opposition is graded as pass or fail.

For the course as a whole, the following grading system is used: Pass with distinction (Väl godkänd, VG), Pass (Godkänd, G) and Fail (Underkänd, U).

Rules and regulations concerning the production of academic texts and correct referencing will be applicable to all written assignments. Grades on the course are awarded when students have passed all examinations and compulsory elements. Note as well examination modes below for the course as a whole.

Additional regulations
When a thesis has been written in English, the seminar should as a general rule also be held in English, unless all seminar participants (including side opponents and seminar leader) are Swedish speaking. The written main- and side-oppositions may be in Swedish provided that the seminar leader is Swedish speaking.

The thesis should normally be jointly written by two authors. It is not possible for two students who jointly write a thesis, to be registered for different types of theses (e.g. one student writing a 1st year Master's thesis and the other a 2nd year Master's thesis).

Supervision is only guaranteed during the semester when the student is firstly registered on the thesis course, regardless of how much supervision that has been utilized.

The thesis course is a campus course, which implies personal presence for supervision, participation in seminars, and collaboration with a thesis partner.

For students following a master's program, the subject for the thesis should be within the scope of the master's program. For further information, see descriptions for awarding degrees (in Marketing, Management etc.).

As a rule of thumb, the scope of the thesis should be approximately 40-60 pages.

The empirical material that is utilized in the thesis should on request be available for supervisor, main opponents and the graders in its original form (raw-data).

When the grade has been set, archive copies of the completed thesis shall as soon as possible, and within 4 weeks, be submitted in both paper and digital form.

Expected learning outcomes

See information in seperate module.

Required Knowledge

Admitted to the joint study Master's Program in Strategic Project Management or equivalent.
English B from Swedish gymnasium or the equivalent.

Form of instruction

See respective module.

Examination modes

See each separate module and below.

The following grading system is used:
Pass with distinction (Väl godkänd, VG, 75% or more),
Pass (Godkänd, G, 50% or more)
Fail (Underkänd U, less than 50%).

Grades on the course are awarded when the student has passed all examinations and compulsory course elements. The course is given and examined in English.
To receive the grade Pass with distinction (VG) in the 30 credits course consisting of four modules of the same size, the student must have achieved Pass with distinction (VG) in at least three out of four modules. In shorter courses for example 7,5 credit courses, 15 credit courses or 22,5 credits courses Pass with distinction (VG) is given when the student has achieved at least 75% of the total weighted points.

A student who does not pass at the time of the written examination will be offered an opportunity to sit a further examination within two months. Beyond that, additional examination opportunities normally arise every academic year, one week prior to the start of the autumn term. If required by specific circumstances, the Director of Studies may decide on other forms of examination

In case of failure on seminar participation or individual and group assignments, compensating assignments must be completed in accordance with instructions given, no later than two weeks after the completion of the module. Mandatory assignments (seminars, written assignments, cases, computer assignments etc.) that have not been handed in within stipulated time must be done the next time the course is offered. If the form of examination does not permit repetition other forms of re-examination may be used.

When a student has failed an examination on two occasions, he or she has a right to have another grading teacher. A written request for an alternative examiner should be handed to the director of studies no later than two weeks before the next examination opportunity.

A student who has passed an examination cannot redo the examination to get a higher grade.

If a student fails to present a photo ID at the occasion of a written exam in an exam room will not be allowed to take the exam.

Disciplinary action may be taken against students who uses unauthorized help aids or in some other way tries to mislead on a test or when another type of task is being evaluated. Rules and regulations concerning the production of academic texts and correct referencing will be applicable to all written assignments, see instructions in the thesis manual, Thesis Writing in Business Administration. Urkund records may be used for control. In addtion, Umeå University rules and regulations for education and research applies.

Educational activities are designed to facilitate students towards achieving expected learning outcomes and can explain, supplement and provide contrast to the course literature and other relevant course materials.

Other regulations

Academic credit transfers are according to the University credit transfer regulations.

This course is only offered to incoming exchange students participating in the joint program, Master Program for Strategic Project Management (MSPME).

This course overlaps 2fe123, 2fe047, 2fe201, 2fe040, 2fe404, 2fe403, 2fe408 and therefore can not be included (all credits) in the degree together with this course.