Hoppa direkt till innehållet

Information till studenter och medarbetare med anledning av covid-19 (Uppdaterad: 14 januari 2021)

printicon

Ansvar och förklaringar

Forskningsprojekt Projektet behandlar olika frågor kring moraliskt ansvar: Kan vi vara ansvariga för handlingar som ytterst förklaras av händelser utanför vår kontroll? Kan en grupp människor vara ansvariga för någonting som ingen individ hade möjlighet att påverka?

Projektet behandlar olika frågor kring moraliskt ansvar: Kan vi vara ansvariga för handlingar som ytterst förklaras av händelser utanför vår kontroll? Kan en grupp människor vara ansvariga för någonting som ingen individ hade möjlighet att påverka? En nyckel till att förstå och kunna besvara dessa och andra frågor är att förstå hur tillskrivande av ansvar för händelser är nära förbundet med förklaringar av dessa händelser.

Projektansvarig

Gunnar Björnsson
Övrig/annan befattning
E-post
E-post

Projektöversikt

Projektperiod:

2016-01-23 2019-12-31

Finansiering

Riksbankens jubileumsfond, 2013-2015: 3 105 000 kr
John Templeton Foundation, 2012-2013: 400 000 kr
Vetenskapsrådet: 2016-2019: 2 840 000 kr

Medverkande institutioner och enheter vid Umeå universitet

Humanistisk fakultet, Institutionen för idé- och samhällsstudier

Forskningsämne

Filosofi och vetenskapsteori

Projektbeskrivning

In folk morality, considerations of moral responsibility play a central role in the distribution of blame, praise, punishments and rewards. They affect our interaction with other individuals and our immediate feelings of indignation or guilt, but also the shape of public policy governing health and insurance policies as well as international treaties distributing costs for joint international enterprises and restoration of land. At the same time, ascriptions of moral responsibility raise deep problems. First, many find it hard to reconcile moral responsibility with the naturalistic idea that our actions are causally determined by genetic, environmental and contextual factors. Consequently, discussions of sceptical arguments from determinism or indeterminism constitute one major traditional field of philosophical inquiry. Second, many of the most urgent issues today concern the effects of the behaviour and decisions of a great number of people, either through environmental or economic effects or through voting and other political behaviour or lack thereof. This raises questions concerning to what extent individuals can share responsibility for outcomes over which they had no individual control, and to what extent organised collectives such as nations or corporations can be morally responsible for outcomes of their behaviour.

The project Moral Responsibility as Explanation approaches these and other problems about moral responsibility from a new angle, beginning with an empirical account of why our attributions of moral responsibility display the patterns they do. With such an account, we can understand why people are prone to scepticism when considering the possibility of determinism or thinking about external causes of actions, and why people are tempted to attribute shared moral responsibility to groups and to hold nations and corporations responsible while being worried that lack of individual control undermines responsibility. And with that understanding, we are better placed to think clearly about moral responsibility and to engage appropriately in practices of holding people responsible.

The project is conducted in close collaboration with the Moral Responsibility research initiative at the University of Gothenburg. For more information, see http://phil.gu.se/moralresponsibility/